bug-m4
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: next snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: next snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:39:35 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080708 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Alain Guibert on 8/28/2008 8:59 AM:
> Hello Eric,

Hi Alain,

> 
> | 132.diversions fails

I think I finally nailed this, but am waiting for Bruno's response.

> 
> | test-stdint.c:252: two `l's in integer constant

Was this just a warning (ie. it still compiled) or a hard error?  That
test is already filtered on other known broken preprocessors; maybe we add
gcc 2.7 and earlier to the list of preprocessors that should skip that test.

> 
> | c_stack_action: Invalid argument
> | SKIP: test-c-stack.sh
> 
> | c_stack_action: Invalid argument
> | SKIP: test-c-stack2.sh

Did you try with libsigsegv 2.6?

> 
> | test-frexpl.c:104: assertion failed
> | FAIL: test-frexpl

Can you do any debugging into this?  Is this using native frexpl or
gnulib's rpl_frexpl?

> 
> | test-fseeko.c:62: assertion failed
> | ./test-fseeko.sh: line 3: 11783 IOT trap/Abort          (core dumped) 
> ./test-fseeko${EXEEXT} 1 <"$srcdir/test-fseeko.sh"
> | FAIL: test-fseeko.sh
> 
> | test-ftello.c:107: assertion failed
> | ./test-ftello.sh: line 3: 11787 IOT trap/Abort          (core dumped) 
> ./test-ftello${EXEEXT} 1 <"$srcdir/test-ftello.sh"
> | FAIL: test-ftello.sh

Ungetc is difficult to port.  I'm not sure how best to try and tackle
this; but enough people complain about it, that it may be worth skipping
those tests on known broken platforms.  At least m4 doesn't trip those bugs.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAki8tXcACgkQ84KuGfSFAYC81ACcCd44k2+PGoLEAbVxUEs3nclV
QTwAoIKxNKp5VYNfw20QiTqu/1dDJoVx
=DQKB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]