[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Which GFDL license for m4 docs?
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: Which GFDL license for m4 docs? |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Apr 2009 08:32:02 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[adding address@hidden
According to Santiago Vila on 4/11/2009 8:25 AM:
> Hello.
>
> While packaging m4 1.4.13 for Debian I noticed that the NEWS file says:
>
> ** The manual is now distributed under the terms of FDL 1.3.
>
> while doc/m4.texinfo still says:
>
> Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
> under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License,
> Version 1.2 or any later version
>
> so apparently m4 1.4.13 is still using 1.2.
The intent is that m4 1.4.13 is using GFDL 1.3; the license file
fdl-1.3.texi is intentionally included as part of the manual. You have
thus identified a bug in the comment at the top of m4.texinfo.
Do I need to release m4 1.4.14 to correct this licensing discrepancy?
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkngqeIACgkQ84KuGfSFAYCvRgCgtSihuZX2dMTv+C65oJ0MUvmk
ujQAoLT6IHx+B1kVGA44fICIsg0s1x/G
=OzTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----