[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 'withfile' function implementation
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
RE: 'withfile' function implementation |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:02:07 -0500 |
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 09:52 -0800, Lawrence Ibarria wrote:
> I do like this suggestion, feels quite clean!
I implemented the "write" side of this proposal and committed it to CVS,
along with regression tests and documentation.
The "read" side is slightly more work but I can do this one too if
people want it. I'm not sure there's much advantage to it over $(shell
cat <file>) as this is unlikely to be a performance bottleneck.
Although from a portability and implementation alignment point of view
it would be useful.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- Re: 'withfile' function implementation, Paul Smith, 2012/01/16
- Re: 'withfile' function implementation, Tim Murphy, 2012/01/16
- Re: 'withfile' function implementation, David Boyce, 2012/01/16
- RE: 'withfile' function implementation, Lawrence Ibarria, 2012/01/23
- RE: 'withfile' function implementation,
Paul Smith <=
- Re: 'withfile' function implementation, David Boyce, 2012/01/30
- Re: 'withfile' function implementation, Paul Smith, 2012/01/30
- Re: 'withfile' function implementation, David Boyce, 2012/01/30
- Re: 'withfile' function implementation, Paul Smith, 2012/01/31
- Re: 'withfile' function implementation, David Boyce, 2012/01/31