[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/3] Introduce $(compare ...) for numerical comparison
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/3] Introduce $(compare ...) for numerical comparison |
|
Date: |
Mon, 06 Dec 2021 12:30:42 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Nov 28 2021, Paul Smith wrote:
> The C standard defines the largest unsigned long long value
> as 18446744073709551615, the largest signed long long value
> as 9223372036854775807, and the smallest signed long long value as -
> 9223372036854775808. So, the definition cannot be wrong in any
> standards-conforming implementation of C.
This is wrong. These are *minimum* limits.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Introduce $(compare ...) for numerical comparison,
Andreas Schwab <=