[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wide vs. complex characters
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: wide vs. complex characters |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 13:17:34 -0400 |
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 01:10:47AM -0230, Neil Zanella wrote:
>
> The following description is given for cchar_t:
>
> A type that refers to a string consisting of a spacing wide character, up
> to 5 non-spacing wide characters, and zero or more attributes of any
> type. See Attributes, Color Pairs, and Renditions. A null cchar_t object
> terminates arrays of cchar_t objects.
>
> What is the point of cchar_t and why should cchar_t be so wide???
> Does this have to do with encoding attributes into the characters
> themselves? And what is the purpose of the spacing wide character?
as I understand it, they're describing characters which are built up
by overstriking onto the same box. So cchar_t is an array of the
pieces, and they've introduced the notion of non-spacing characters
to imply that they overstrike.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com