[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?
From: |
Avery Pennarun |
Subject: |
Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch? |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:56:29 -0500 |
On 11/02/2008, Steve Litt <address@hidden> wrote:
> nCurses can be made to work right with Valgrind during compile
> by ./configure --disable-leaks. Trouble is, I have to have two different
> nCurseses.
>
> Would it be difficult to have make the --disable-leaks decision at runtime
> rather than at compile time? That way I could use just one nCurses --
> presumably the one that my distro uses to make all their tools.
Isn't there a function you can call at the end of your program that
does the same thing as --disable-leaks? I seem to remember using such
a thing in the past.
Have fun,
Avery
- Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Steve Litt, 2008/02/11
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?,
Avery Pennarun <=
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Thomas Dickey, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Avery Pennarun, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Thomas Dickey, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Avery Pennarun, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Thomas Dickey, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Avery Pennarun, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Stephan Beal, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Steve Litt, 2008/02/12