[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: field buffer vs visible field size
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: field buffer vs visible field size |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 04:29:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 11:22:11AM -0300, tjareson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using the ncurses forms a lot and have sometimes the situation
> that the string I'm assigning by pointer to a field with
> set_field_buffer is bigger than the field size (including off screen
> rows), which leads to the result that characters are cut off at the
> end when the field is displayed.
> (which is the required behavior - I don't want to show the seconds
> of a time stamp, so I made the field 3 characters short than the
> content)
>
> I'm only not sure if that cause any potential problem of memory
> corruption within the forms library?
no - the form library makes a copy of the given value.
If the field is "growable", the library also assumes the value is null-
terminated (so it could be shorter).
--
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature