[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: curses should not suppress unassigned codepoints
|
From: |
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson |
|
Subject: |
Re: curses should not suppress unassigned codepoints |
|
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:58:50 +0800 |
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Thomas Dickey <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 06:33:13PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:18:59PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Unicode codepoints that don't yet have a character assigned
>> > to them, are somehow suppressed by ncurses.
> On second thought: unassigned codepoints don't have a defined width
> and representation. ncurses has always displayed a blank for those
> cases.
Why is that better than, say, the REPLACEMENT CHARACTER?
--
Johann
I'm not from the internet, I just work there.