[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20210522
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20210522 |
Date: |
Mon, 24 May 2021 15:14:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 02:59:39PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Sven Joachim" <svenjoac@gmx.de>
> | To: "Thomas Dickey" <dickey@his.com>
> | Cc: "Ncurses Mailing List" <bug-ncurses@gnu.org>
> | Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 1:27:23 PM
> | Subject: Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20210522
>
> | On 2021-05-23 23:33 +0000, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> |
> |> 20210522
> |> + regenerate configure scripts with autoconf 2.52.20210509 to eliminate
> |> an unnecessary warning in config.log (report by Miroslav Lichvar).
> |
> | You regenerated the configure scripts in the Ada95 and test directories,
> | but not the one in the top level directory, although there have been
> | changes to aclocal.m4. That seems to be an oversight, right?
>
> oversight, yes (I was working on something else yesterday, and had forgotten
> while I was investigating a build problem that I'd fetched the older file
> into the directory where I construct the patch-files).
On the other hand, the version which I labeled (and exported to
ncurses-snapshots) is the intended one. If it doesn't add to the
confusion, simply regenerating the patch and tarball seems simplest.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net>
https://invisible-island.net
ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature