[Bug-ocrad] Some more examples ...

[Uwe Dippel]

There are just some observations here on our side after some tests of 
today with respect to width of essentially the same font.

One sample is a built-in font, using lpr {filename}; while the other is 
the same file in KWrite, printed with CUPS. KWrite, for one reason or 
another beyond our intention, squeezes the characters very close, it 
looks like highly over-kerned.

While we surely don't expect the overdone kerning to recognise properly, 
we are still astonished that the wide character distance results in 
flawless recognition, while the overkerned sample misses out one clearly 
existing letter, an 'i', with its characteristic dot. Also, a very 
obvious third vertical stroke of a 'm' is definitively discarded.
We have scanned both another time, at a rotation of 180°, and found 
identically the same result.
Again, we are happy with what we get, though would like to raise our 
concern about the non-recognition of two unambiguous features; the 
existence of a letter 'i' and three strokes in an 'm' that are 
recognized reproducibly as 'n'.

Uwe