[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: auto* pre-configure process
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: auto* pre-configure process |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:12:57 -0800 |
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:11:14AM +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
=) I've had that problem.
`make dist' takes care of that too... ;)
> Aargh - yes. I really meant to say "automake -a -c".
>
> Not using the -c (or --copy) is fine for personal use. It sometimes bites
> you if you distribute stuff based on it (tar stores symlinks, not the
> files they refer to) so I took the habit of using -c at all times.
>
> Danny
>
> Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:39:51PM +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> >
> > I tend to use automake -a. It them symlinks everything instead of making
> > copies.
> >
> > > Try the --copy option of automake. That'll solve the missing files issue.
>
> --
> Danny Backx (address@hidden address@hidden)
> Home page : http://users.skynet.be/danny.backx
> Projects: LessTif (http://www.lesstif.org)
> Oleo (http://www.gnu.org/software/oleo/oleo.html)
--
Talk is a trick for taking the mystery out of the world.
- Seeker, Beyond the fall of night.