[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?
From: |
H. J. Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs? |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Sep 2002 13:35:44 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:11:13PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> See
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72686
>
> My question why parted even bothers with number of cylinders > 1024
> for legacy stuff. Linux's fdisk doesn't. Here is a patch.
I updated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72686
H.J.
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?,
H. J. Lu <=
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/09/14
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/09/15
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/09/15
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/09/15
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/09/15
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/09/15
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/09/15