[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Regression on portray_clause/2
From: |
Daniel Diaz |
Subject: |
Re: Regression on portray_clause/2 |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:15:50 +0200 |
Thanks for the bug report.
You fix seems you. I check it asap.
Daniel
Le 24 août 2012 à 14:37, Thierry Martinez a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> With GNU Prolog 1.4.1, portray_clause/2 ignores its second argument and
> prints the its first argument (supposed to be a stream) as
> portray_clause/1 would do.
>
> The culprit seems to be the line 57 of src/BipsPl/pretty.pl which calls
> '$call_c'('Pl_Portray_Clause_2'(SorA, Term, AboveB)),
> instead of
> '$call_c'('Pl_Portray_Clause_3'(SorA, Term, AboveB)),
>
> This bug was not present in GNU Prolog 1.4.0.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Thierry.
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-prolog mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-prolog
--
Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a ete trouve.