bug-rcs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNU RCS 5.7.93 (pretest for 5.8) available


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: GNU RCS 5.7.93 (pretest for 5.8) available
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:33:55 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)

Hi Thien-Thi,

Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:

> This message is to announce that pretest release of GNU RCS
> (Revision Control System) is available.

Congratulations for this brave endeavor!  :-)

I tried to build it on NixOS GNU/Linux on x86_64 and noticed several
glitches related to the test suite:

  1. The tests do “. common”, which means that ‘common’ is looked up in
     $PATH, which fails unless ‘.’ is in $PATH.

  2. Why is a custom ‘check-TESTS’ target needed in the ‘v’ (!)
     directory?

  3. Why move executables from ‘src’ to ‘src/0pre/bin’?

  4. How about using ‘set -e’ in test scripts?

  5. The ‘rlog’ program as run by the tests segfaults:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ cat t000.d/out 
__________________________________________________
DOING: rcs -i -t-t000 $v
RCS file: t000.d/x,v
done  
RESULT: 0
|head   ;
|access;
|symbols;
|locks; strict;
|comment        @# @;
|
|
|desc
|@t000
|@
_________________________________________ rlog
|
|RCS file: t000.d/x,v
|Working file: t000.d/x
|head:
|branch:
|locks: strict
|access list:
|symbolic names:
|keyword substitution: kv
|total revisions: 0
|description:
|t000
|=============================================================================
__________________________________________________
DOING: ci -u -r4.20 -mHELLO $w
t000.d/x,v  <--  t000.d/x
initial revision: 4.20
done
RESULT: 0
|head   4.20;
|access;
|symbols;
|locks; strict;
|comment        @# @;
|
|4.20
|date   2010.09.28.16.06.46;    author ludo;    state Exp;
|branches;
|next   ;
|
|
|desc
|@t000
|@
|
|
|4.20
|log
|@HELLO
|@
|text 
|@nonempty
|@
__________________________________________________
DOING: rcs -q -o4.20 $w
./common: line 42:  7330 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) rcs -q -o4.20 $w
RESULT: 139
|head   4.20;
|access;
|symbols;
|locks; strict;
|comment        @# @;
|
|4.20 
|date   2010.09.28.16.06.46;    author ludo;    state Exp;
|branches;
|next   ;
|
|
|desc 
|@t000
|@
|
|
|4.20 
|log  
|@HELLO
|@
|text 
|@nonempty
|@
_________________________________________ rlog
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

    Likewise with ‘t001’:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ cat t001.d/err 
RCS file: t001.d/x,v
done
t001.d/x,v  <--  t001.d/x
initial revision: 4.20
done
./common: line 42:  7496 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) rcs -nWONDERFUL: 
$w
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

     and the backtrace:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Core was generated by `rlog t001.d/x'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  hash_pjw (x=0x8888888888888888, tablesize=149) at hash-pjw.c:36
36        for (s = x; *s; s++)
(gdb) bt full
#0  hash_pjw (x=0x8888888888888888, tablesize=149) at hash-pjw.c:36
        s = 0x8888888888888888 <Address 0x8888888888888888 out of bounds>
        h = <value optimized out>
#1  0x000000000040a842 in hash (
    revno=0x8888888888888888 <Address 0x8888888888888888 out of bounds>, 
ht=0x17d5280)
    at b-grok.c:469
No locals.
#2  gethash (revno=0x8888888888888888 <Address 0x8888888888888888 out of 
bounds>, ht=0x17d5280)
    at b-grok.c:498
        slot = <value optimized out>
#3  0x000000000040bc21 in full (to=0x17d5090, f=<value optimized out>) at 
b-grok.c:796
        ny = 0x17ed3f0
        d = 0x17d5790
        ls = 0x17d5850
        count = <value optimized out>
        box = {entry = 0xa, next = 0x8888888888888888}
        tp = <value optimized out>
        g = 0x17d5190
        neck = <value optimized out>
#4  grok_all (to=0x17d5090, f=<value optimized out>) at b-grok.c:823
        repo = 0x17d51f0
#5  0x00000000004069b7 in pairnames (argc=<value optimized out>, 
argv=0x7fff5f3b545a, 
    rcsopen=0x7, mustread=<value optimized out>, quiet=<value optimized out>) 
at rcsfnms.c:384
        p = 0x17ed3f0 "\200W}\001"
        arg = <value optimized out>
        RCS1 = <value optimized out>
        base = 0x7fff5f3b545a "x"
        RCSbase = <value optimized out>
        x = <value optimized out>
        mani_filename = <value optimized out>
        paired = false
        dlen = 7
        baselen = 1
        xlen = <value optimized out>
        from = 0x17d5130
        maybe = {open = 0x406d60 <rcsreadopen>, mustread = true, tentative = {
            string = 0x17eb2e0 "t001.d/x,v", size = 10}, space = 0x17eb230, 
bestfit = {
            string = 0x17eb2e0 "t001.d/x,v", size = 10}, status = 0x17d4188, 
eno = 2}
        __func__ = "pairnames"
#6  0x000000000040318e in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fff5f3b4c20) at rlog.c:924
        tip = 0x1
        defbr = 0x2ab3f7fa0d40 "\226\021@"
        strictly_locking = false
        kws = 10931
        repo_filename = 0x2ab3f7f8a7e3 "\205\300\017\217\205\001"
        locks = 0x7fff5f3b4b00
        out = 0x2ab3f84f9780
        a = <value optimized out>
        newargv = 0x7fff5f3b4c18
        accessListString = 0x41130b "\naccess list:"
        accessFormat = 0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>
        headFormat = 0x4114a8 "\nRCS file: %s\nWorking file: 
%s\nhead:%s%s\nbranch:%s%s\nlocks:%s"
        symbolFormat = 0x4112fd "\n\t%s: %s"
        descflag = true
        selectflag = true
        onlylockflag = false
        onlyRCSflag = false
        pre5 = false
        shownames = true
        revno = 1
        program = {name = 0x41126f "rlog", 
          help = 0x4116a0 "[options] file ...\nOptions:\n  -L", ' ' <repeats 12 
times>, "Ignore RCS files with no locks set.\n  -R", ' ' <repeats 12 times>, 
"Print the RCS file name only.\n  -h", ' ' <repeats 12 times>, "Print only the 
\"header\" information.\n  -t", ' ' <repeats 12 times>, "Like "..., exiterr = 
0x403cb0 <exiterr>}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Well, I hope this helps.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]