Re: [Bug-readline] documentation of signal handling

[frederik]

> Yeah, you should look at the actual documentation.  Not only does it
> explain the situation, readline-7.0 adds a variable that restores the
> previous persistent signal handling behavior if the application desires.
> That reduces the `undocumented sequence' to one line of code.
> 
> If you're not going to read the documentation, or at least the new feature
> descriptions in the CHANGES file, there's not a lot I can do to help.

Since you told me you weren't going to fix the problem I had
identified, I had no reason to look at CHANGES or to reread the
manual.

Now I see 'rl_pending_signal()' and 'rl_persistent_signal_handlers' -
thank you!

> The example still exits on SIGINT, as most programs do.

Can you add an example that demonstrates how to use the new variable
and function to get good (bash-like) behavior on SIGWINCH and SIGINT?
Or should I put this on my own (long) TODO-list?

Thank you,

Frederick