[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Standards for programming languages
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Standards for programming languages |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:21:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> I changed the GNU Coding Standards to say that we no longer
>> prefer C to other such languages.
[...]
> What about mentioning Scheme here?
We were diverted from this question, which remained unanswered.
Specifically I would suggest something along these lines (I’d move Java
last, because it’s not so commonly used in the free software community):
Other languages commonly used in the free software community, such as
Scheme, Python, Ruby, and Java, are OK too. Scheme, as implemented by
address@hidden, plays a particular role in the GNU System: it is the
preferred language to extend programs written in C/C++, and also a
fine language for a wide range of applications. The more GNU
components use Guile and Scheme, the more users are able to extend and
combine them (@pxref{The Emacs Thesis,,, guile, GNU Guile Reference
Manual}).
(A copy of the node referenced here can be seen at
<http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/The-Emacs-Thesis.html>.)
What do you think?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
pgpzTeAEqoKEv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Standards for programming languages,
Ludovic Courtès <=