[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Sep 2013 22:44:02 GMT |
eblake> hence my proposed wording patch to make-stds.texi
Ah, I see now. Looks generally fine. Thanks.
Automake would also need a tweak to add run_DATA alongside its
existing localstate_DATA primary.
Stefano? (See other msgs for background.)
(I feel sure that rms will be much happier if you, ie, "automake
maintainers", have explicitly said you're ok with the change. Will
explicitly cc you this time in case your bug-standards mail is getting
filed ...)
Thanks,
Karl
- /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Doug Goldstein, 2013/09/05
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Eric Blake, 2013/09/05
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Karl Berry, 2013/09/05
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Eric Blake, 2013/09/05
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Karl Berry, 2013/09/08
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/09/09
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Eric Blake, 2013/09/09
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Paul Smith, 2013/09/09
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Eric Blake, 2013/09/09
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Karl Berry, 2013/09/09
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Eric Blake, 2013/09/09
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/09/10
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Karl Berry, 2013/09/10