Re: Avoid Lisp and Scheme in the same list

[Thien-Thi Nguyen]

() Tino Calancha <address@hidden>
() Thu, 12 May 2016 19:27:22 +0900 (JST)

   for your time discussing my report.

I think your arguments are cogent.  Could you perhaps reform them
(along w/ a revised patch) in a way that keeps Scheme and drops Lisp;
or reorders those languages to minimize any indication of relationship
between them (such an explicit indication can be made later, or not at
all); or in general, adopts a design that synthesizes your concerns w/
those of GNU?

BTW, i was (in a cranky mood and thus) a bit put off by the patch.
Personally, i prefer a unified diff (although i'm not sure there isn't
a list preference for something else), w/ very few lines changed.  In
this case, the source in question is texinfo, so adding line breaks and
avoiding refilling is one way to focus things.

-- 
Thien-Thi Nguyen -----------------------------------------------
  (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp:
    (defun responsep (type via)
      (case type
        (technical (eq 'mailing-list via))
        ...))
---------------------------------------------- GPG key: 4C807502

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature