[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using VC for change descriptions
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Using VC for change descriptions |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Jan 2018 21:18:12 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Furthermore, comments in the source code about why it does something are
> comments explaining things that are nonobvious about the current state of
> the source code, e.g. why a particular special case is needed. They are
> not about how it got there.
They aren't?? Do you mean, you think GNU maintainers are not carrying out
what the coding standards say?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, (continued)
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Richard Stallman, 2018/01/07
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Paul Eggert, 2018/01/07
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Richard Stallman, 2018/01/08
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Richard Stallman, 2018/01/07
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Joseph Myers, 2018/01/09
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Richard Stallman, 2018/01/14
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Joseph Myers, 2018/01/15
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Joseph Myers, 2018/01/15
Re: Using VC for change descriptions,
Richard Stallman <=