[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using VC for change descriptions
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Using VC for change descriptions |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jan 2018 21:15:34 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Instead, I suggest that we temporarily experiment with a real GNU
> project: that is, we issue a special dispensation just for that
> project, where it can try out the proposed guidelines for a few
> months, and then we look at how well the proposal worked in that
> project.
I don't see how that experiment makes sense. What aspect we would try
to observe and judge? How would we reach a conclusion?
Suppose on looking at the results I conclude that the missing ChangeLog
information was a real loss. What they would we do to get written?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, (continued)
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2018/01/09
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Paul Eggert, 2018/01/09
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Richard Stallman, 2018/01/09
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Paul Eggert, 2018/01/10
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, John Darrington, 2018/01/10
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Joseph Myers, 2018/01/10
Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Mike Gerwitz, 2018/01/01
Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Joseph Myers, 2018/01/09
Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Richard Stallman, 2018/01/15
Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Joseph Myers, 2018/01/16
Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2018/01/02