[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Criteria for Acceptable Git to ChangeLog
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Criteria for Acceptable Git to ChangeLog |
Date: |
Sat, 12 May 2018 17:19:55 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> So I don't think this discussion is going to move further unless we
> start talking about the minimum acceptable criteria for a scm-to-change-log
> program should be.
I think we need something that will generate, from the repo, the list
of entities changed -- reliably enough that errors are rare and not a
problem.
As for the descriptions of the changes in each entity, that is important
when the change in an entity is complex enough to want description.
We could put that sort of info in commit messages, by saying something
about how the change works.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Joseph Myers, 2018/05/08
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/08
- Criteria for Acceptable Git to ChangeLog, John Darrington, 2018/05/12
- Re: Criteria for Acceptable Git to ChangeLog,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Criteria for Acceptable Git to ChangeLog, John Darrington, 2018/05/15
- Re: Criteria for Acceptable Git to ChangeLog, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/15
- Re: Criteria for Acceptable Git to ChangeLog, John Darrington, 2018/05/16
- Re: Criteria for Acceptable Git to ChangeLog, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/16
- Re: Criteria for Acceptable Git to ChangeLog, John Darrington, 2018/05/17
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/14
- Re: Using VC for change descriptions, Joseph Myers, 2018/05/14