[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recommendations for orthography?
From: |
Brandon Invergo |
Subject: |
Re: Recommendations for orthography? |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2019 20:30:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2 |
> Currently, our standards don't have any policy for spelling,
> neither in documentation, nor in user visible strings.
>
> I see all sorts of different spellings of common words used
> throughout GNU - sometimes the same word is spelt differently
> in different instances within the same project.
I think consistency within a project is the most important thing.
> Quite apart from appearing inconsistent, this makes it hard
> when grepping through documentation/code for particular
> things.
For documentation, I don't think it's important to have a GNU-wide
standard other than internal consistency (and otherwise idiomatic
English if written by a non-native speaker).
In the particular example of grepping documentation, I would argue that
having a well-made index is more important.
> Obviously translators are free to use whatever conventions
> they think appropriate for their locale, but should we have
> a style guide to be followed when programs are run in the C
> locale?
User-visible strings should be covered by gettext and so, as you say,
it's up to translators to localize appropriately.
For the C locale, it's a valid question but I'm afraid that like Jose I
don't have a strong opinion, other than consistency within the software.
--
-brandon