[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jan 2025 17:49:17 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > GNU packages need not be FSF-copyrighted; this is up to the author(s),
> > generally at the time the package is dubbed GNU@. When copyright is
> > -assigned to the FSF, the FSF can act to stop GPL violations about the
> > -package. Otherwise, legal actions are up to the author(s). The rest
> > +assigned to the FSF, the FSF has authority to act to stop GPL
> > +violations about the package (otherwise, legal actions are up to the
> > +author(s)). It also allows us to grant additional permissions on a
> > +package, such as an exception, if the need should arise. Additionally,
> > +holding the copyright allows us to upgrade the license of a package
> > +even if it had been initially released under "GPLv2 only" (instead of
> > +the "or later" licensing option as recommended by the FSF). The rest
> > of this section is about the case when a package is FSF-copyrighted.
It is a good change.
Nowadays, insted of changing these things by myself, I discuss the
changes (mainly with Krzysztof) and we decide together. It is ok
if he installs the changes after those discussions.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)