[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inconsistencies in the automake and texinfo manuals
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Inconsistencies in the automake and texinfo manuals |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:04:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
Thanks for the reports, and apologies for the delay in responding.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 07:09:25PM +0000, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in @node Minimum the Texinfo manual lists as valid file extensions .texinfo,
> .texi, .txi or .tex is this order and in
> the footnote states, that the longer extensions are preferred. This is a
> recommendation to use .texinfo. In the
> Automake manual .tex, .texinfo, .texi are accepted, but the former generate
> a warning. Please update the Texinfo
> manual to state, that when used with Automake the extension shall be .texi.
I've put .texi first in the list.
> Please replace the link in @node GNU Sample Text “The version.texi file in
> the @include command is maintained
> automatically by Automake (*note (automake)Top::)” with *note
> (automake)Texinfo. The functionality of version.texi is
> described there.
Thanks, done.
> Automake defines in version.texi the variables VERSION, UPDATED and
> UPDATED-MONTH, but the Texinfo manual does not
> mention the last variable.
I've added it. (There is also EDITION for some reason (maybe to separate
the versions of the manual from the versions of the program), but I
didn't think it was worth mentioning.)
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Inconsistencies in the automake and texinfo manuals,
Gavin Smith <=