[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Agenda for next Texinfo release
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Agenda for next Texinfo release |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:10:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 10:46:20PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 12:36:28PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > The main area of work that I can see before the next Texinfo release is
> > made is compatibility of the XS parser with the Perl parser.
> >
> > I have started some work on testing manuals and automatically looking
> > for differences in the output, but need to do more on this. Basically,
> > I have a short shell script with a loop in it like this:
> >
> > for m in $manuals; do
> > x=X/`basename $m`.info
> > p=P/`basename $m`.info
> > TEXINFO_XS=require texi2any $m -o $x --no-split
> > TEXINFO_XS=omit texi2any $m -o $p --no-split
> > diff $x $p
> > done
> >
> > I also need to document that @example can take an argument.
>
> Is the design of that decided? I would still be in favor of
> * having arguments separated by comma ,
> * giving a meaning to the first argument (the language) and the
> second (small or not for compatibilities with @smallexample and
> others).
Implemented and documented now.