Re: tiny main/utils.c fixes

[Gavin Smith]

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 02:23:59PM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Tiny patch; some older or newer compilers (I forgot which) will
> complain if there is no compound statment after a label.

Thank you!  I am surprised it compiled before as a statement is supposed
to follow a label - even a single ; will do.

> 2024-05-29  Alfred M. Szmidt  <ams@gnu.org>
> 
>       * tp/Texinfo/XS/main/utils.c (clear_option, free_option)
>       (initialize_option): Add a no-op compund statment to mitigate
>       errors from GCC.
> 
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tp/Texinfo/XS/main/utils.c b/tp/Texinfo/XS/main/utils.c
> index 6d209b699c..b90549afab 100644
> --- a/tp/Texinfo/XS/main/utils.c
> +++ b/tp/Texinfo/XS/main/utils.c
> @@ -1610,6 +1610,7 @@ clear_option (OPTION *option)
>          option->integer = -1;
>  
>        default:
> +     break;
>      }
>  }
>  
> @@ -1641,6 +1642,7 @@ free_option (OPTION *option)
>  
>        case GOT_integer:
>        default:
> +     break;
>      }
>  }
>  
> @@ -1676,6 +1678,7 @@ initialize_option (OPTION *option, enum 
> global_option_type type)
>          break;
>  
>        default:
> +     break;
>      }
>  }
>  
>