Re: [Bug-wget] wget 1.11.4 on interix(3.5)

[Hrvoje Niksic]

Micah Cowan <address@hidden> writes:

> Hm... well, what about a check for C99 first, and then a fallback on
> checking for HAVE_STDINT_H?

Isn't HAVE_STDINT_H a C99 thing?  C89 doesn't seem to mention it.

> Or, I suppose we could consider assuming an unsigned long is large
> enough to hold a pointer, and eschew the use of uintptr_t.

We used to do exactly that, but it doesn't work on Win64.