[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] wget with the -i option.
From: |
Ray Sterner |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] wget with the -i option. |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:00:54 -0400 (EDT) |
Hello Micah,
Thanks for the feedback on this. I was almost banging my head against
the wall trying to get this to work.
Is the change you mention below something that might be made?
Is the -i option used very often? Seems like it should be really
useful. Anyway, I'll be looking forward to a version with the
update when it comes.
Thanks for your help.
Ray Sterner address@hidden
The Johns Hopkins University North latitude 39.16 degrees.
Applied Physics Laboratory West longitude 76.90 degrees.
Laurel, MD 20723-6099
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Micah Cowan wrote:
> Ray Sterner wrote:
> > Hello Micah,
> >
> > When I use wget to grab all the files from the ftp site they download
> > very quickly (relatively). That means it's possible to do.
>
> Yes. It's only a design flaw that prevents this from working on a
> list-of-URLs. The recursive-descent mode, by its very nature, almost has
> to reuse the same connection, but for some reason, the list-of-URLs mode
> doesn't.
>
> > I can see why making a new connection for each file in a list is a
> > reasonable default, they might be scattered all over the web.
>
> If they were, then it would make sense. But it can't be that hard to
> save the connection and check to see if we still have an open connection
> to the host, just as we do on HTTP. Though I suppose the main difference
> there is that HTTP doesn't have to keep track of what the current
> working directory is, the way FTP would need to.
>
> > I guess the get-all-the-files mode must use a single connection for
> > everything on the target site.
>
> Yup.
>
> > Maybe a useful new option would be one that tries to use the same
> > connection for as many files as it can in the given list.
>
> IMO, this doesn't need to be a new option. I don't believe anyone
> _wants_ the current behavior for URL-lists, and if for some reason they
> do, they could just run wget itself in a loop, giving it a single arg at
> a time.
>
> It just needs someone to make the change. :)
>
>
> --
> Micah J. Cowan
> http://micah.cowan.name/
>