Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output

[Ángel González]

Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> the patch is huge and I think we don't want to add some many files into
> the wget tree.  Can't we assume the user will install the warc tools by
> herself and let configure check if they are installed or not?  This will
> require some more work but the result will be much less intrusive.  What
> do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Giuseppe
I don't think all those files are even remotely needed.
I am seeing for instance, python files for creating warc interacting 
with curl.
Why would that be useful in wget repository?
I -optimistically- think we could make warc files with a simpler 
implementation.
Also, the patch seems to duplicate code (compare lines 337731-337810 with
337944-338013 in the patch file). Surely that could be refactored?