[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] Big refactoring
From: |
Fernando Cassia |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] Big refactoring |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 02:11:20 -0300 |
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Micah Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Wget is monolithic, portable to non-Unix, written entirely in
> C, and can be built to have few dependencies. My "Niwt" project has the
> specific aims to be as hackable and behavior-changeable as possible,
Then I say both serve specific purposes... ie ´classic wget´ is more
easily portable (win32, os2, you-name-it), while next-gen wget would
be unix-linux oriented.
Why not just bump the version and let´s keep ´classic´ wget and ´wget
2.0´ in parallel?.
If ´classic´ wget rots someone else will come along and continue
enhancing it to support new protocols etc (spdy anyone?) because he
needs a current tool for his non-unix based OS...
FC
Re: [Bug-wget] Big refactoring, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2012/08/21