Re: [Bug-wget] Options nv and q of Wget

[Tim Ruehsen]

Am Monday 17 December 2012 schrieb Catia B:
> Thanks but it´s not really better...
> I really need to get to my first output because I use it on a script where
> I need to compare multiple outputs And I don't know why it´s not working
> 
> Catia

- You could change your script (or ask someone to do it for you).
- You could install an old version of Wget (not recommended).

Without further details, I doubt anybody on this list can help you.

Even when posting your script here: If it is non-trivial, it is unlikely that 
anyone invest her/his time do the job.

Regards, Tim

> 
> Le 17 déc. 2012 à 15:41, Tim Ruehsen <address@hidden> a écrit :
> > Am Monday 17 December 2012 schrieb UnknownG:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> I need to get the output of this wget command:
> >> wget -r -l inf --spider -nv --page-requisites -S http://<ip address>
> >> 
> >> When I used it with version 1.10.2, the -nv option worked as it should
> >> and I got something like this:
> >> 200 OK
> >> 200 OK
> >> http://<ip address>>: index.html not found
> >> ERROR 404 NOT found
> >> 
> >> And that is what I want
> >> 
> >> But when I used exactly the same command with version 1.13.4, I got
> >> this: 2012-12-17 11:10:50 URL:http://<ip address>/<rest of the
> >> link>[<value>/<value>] -> "<ip address>/<rest of the link>" [1]
> >> 
> >>  HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> >>  Server: XXXXX
> >>  Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:10:51 GMT
> >>  Content-Type: text/html; Charset=UTF-8
> >>  Content-Length: 16027
> >>  Connection: keep-alive
> >>  Vary: Accept-Encoding
> >>  Vary: Accept-Encoding
> >>  X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
> >>  pragma: no-cache
> >>  Expires: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:10:50 GMT
> >>  Cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0,
> >> 
> >> pre-check=0
> >> 
> >> And it shouldn't be that...
> >> Even with -q option I got the same output, as if it was a bug?
> >> 
> >> Is it? or did I do something wrong?
> >> 
> >> Thank you
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the option -S outputs the HTTP headers.
> > 
> > Leave it away, and you are much closer to what you want.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> >     Tim Rühsen