[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] Regression since wget 1.10: no_prefix function is
From: |
Tim Rühsen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] Regression since wget 1.10: no_prefix function is *bad* |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2013 22:12:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8-1-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Alex,
snprintf %a seems to print the correct result with wine (set to WinXP), but
the same executable on a real WinXP just prints 'a'.
Replacing the sprintf() by __mingw_sprintf printed the correct result with
wine and on the WinXP machine.
> About C99 - sorry, i think "If article isn't changed/removed then it's
> still actually". Yes, in MinGW mailing lists i find mention about
> "-std=c99" and "changes to mingw_snprintf". Sorry for mistake.
> May be it's time for new test branch - "wget-C99"? And then find what
> fragments (isn't work)/(cannot be hooked) in MinGW/CygWin/MSVC and need to
> replace? Something like "From practice to theory".
That is a good idea.
Should Guiseppe create a test branch upstream or how can we go on ?
> > how do I make a diff to some commit back in time or to upstream ?
> From current to upstream
> git format-patch origin/master
>
> From current to some commit
> git format-patch ccd369d
>
> Single commit
> git format-patch ccd369d^!
>
> Between two commits
> git format-patch 027d9f...ae80fd2
Thanks.
Tim