[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes
From: |
Tim Rühsen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:33:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.9-1-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano:
> Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> In my understanding, all new general patches should go into 'master',
those
> >> regarding metalink/multithreading should go into (experimental)
'parallel-
> >> wget' for later merging with 'master'.
> >
> > obviously it has to be into master too, thanks to have reported it. I
> > am going to cherry-pick from parallel-wget into master.
>
> I have checked it, but I don't think that master needs this fix (the
> patch includes also an improvement, but nothing blocking to be on master
> ASAP). Can you confirm this?
Some people stumbled upon the _PC_NAME_MAX stuff when compiling for Windows.
Just search the last 2 months for '_PC_NAME_MAX'.
I wondered why Bykov Aleksey recommends ' Replace "_PC_NAME_MAX" with "256"
in url.c:1620. Then run ...' (12th June). Since Rays patch should handle
that. I'm shure I also send (at least one) patch regarding this issue, but I
think it/they got lost or something.
However, it boils up and up again, but it is not a blocker that needs to be
fixed ASAP. It's just annoying.
Regards, Tim