Hi Pawel,
Glad that you would like to contribute to GNU Wget.
The bug that you have mentioned, #21693 seems to have been fixed by
Micah himself. The comments state that a patch was applied through
commit edd30.
You should try and test whether the bug still exists or not. Try going
through the details for fnmatch() and see if you can make the code
fail. If so, please create a test for the same and fix it.
In case the bug is already fixed, please look at a couple of other
open bugs, and try fixing those. The bug tracker hasn't been updated
in a while and may not be up-to-date.
Do remember, that in case you do submit a non-trivial patch (>10
lines), you will be required to submit Copyright Assignment to FSF
before your patch can be merged. Giuseppe, the maintainer can fill you
in on those details as and when required.
BTW, Wget v1.14 has been out for nearly a year now.
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 9:15 PM, SEITAZ <address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
Hi All,
I want to give it a go in supporting wget, I'm dooing c for some
years now and I thought I give the gnu/fsf ide a shot ;)
Just couple of questions.
Now.. I've found something small to work on, namely bug 21693,
which is scheduled for release 1.13.
I've got the source from git, got it build, and:
# src/wget --version
GNU Wget 1.14.84-7e85 built on linux-gnu.
So the version moved to 1.14.x but the bug from 1.13 is still
open, is it? If it realy is please sign me up for it.
Thanks,
Pawel
--
Thanking You,
Darshit Shah