[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-wget] wget alpha release 1.14.96-38327

From: Giuseppe Scrivano
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] wget alpha release 1.14.96-38327
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:06:25 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Noël Köthe <address@hidden> writes:

> I could drop 3 documentation patches.
> The Debian bugtracker does not have additional patches.
> I don't track which wget upstream patch fixed which Debian bug if this
> is your request.

would you mind to send the patches to the ML, either by git send-email
or attaching the output git format-patch?  It helps to get more eyes on
Get these patches upstream will make things easier for you as well, you
will have less stuff to rebase when a new version is out.

>> > If anything needs fixing, I'd like to help and ensure a new release
>> > ASAP.
> Maybe going through https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=wget in some
> spare time and comment, tag, close some bugs.:) e.g. bug #36580 just
> need a person with the right savannah account/permissions (nok does not
> have;)).
>> I've delayed it since there were some new bug reports and I had no time
>> to go trough all of them.  From a first check, it seems there is nothing
>> blocking a release, so I will probably do that in the next few days.
>> Is there something we should absolutely consider for inclusion before we
>> make a new release?
> Maybe only a small documentation fix but its minor.
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?33826
> As a friend of release early and release often:
> Go for it;) and the wget user will get a lot of fixes from the 16 month
> of development.

we definitely need a better model than "let's release when we think it
is ok" :-)

Should we move to a release every 3/6 months?

I don't think that doing it more often would make any sense, given the
activity that usually wget has.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]