Re: [Bug-wget] wget alpha release 1.14.96-38327

[Darshit Shah]

Anything still blocking the release?

12 month release cycle sounds good to me. I'm trying to replicate the
aforementioned issues, but no luck still.



On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Noël Köthe <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 24.12.2013, 18:06 +0100 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano:
>
> > > I could drop 3 documentation patches.
> > > The Debian bugtracker does not have additional patches.
> > > I don't track which wget upstream patch fixed which Debian bug if this
> > > is your request.
> >
> > would you mind to send the patches to the ML, either by git send-email
> > or attaching the output git format-patch?  It helps to get more eyes on
> > them.
> > Get these patches upstream will make things easier for you as well, you
> > will have less stuff to rebase when a new version is out.
>
> Sure, but the 3 additional patches are included in 1.14.96-38327.
> wget release 1.14 in Debian is carrying the following patches:
> http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/wget/1.14-5
> and the 1.14.96-38327 reduces them by 3:
> http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/wget/1.14.96.38327-2
> They are only documentation patches. I hope I didn't misunderstand your
> request again.
>
> > > Maybe only a small documentation fix but its minor.
> > > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?33826
> > >
> > > As a friend of release early and release often:
> > > Go for it;) and the wget user will get a lot of fixes from the 16 month
> > > of development.
> >
> > we definitely need a better model than "let's release when we think it
> > is ok" :-)
> >
> > Should we move to a release every 3/6 months?
>
> 12 month would be fine too but I don't have a strong option on this.
>
> > I don't think that doing it more often would make any sense, given the
> > activity that usually wget has.
>
> ACK.
>
> --
> Noël Köthe <noel debian.org>
> Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
>



-- 
Thanking You,
Darshit Shah