[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body
|
From: |
Matthew Atkinson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:39:25 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
On 20/10/14 21:16, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> Since Wget does not explicitly support PUT, we may just care for the POST
> request. Since servers may reject a POST without Content-Length, we are
> better
> off with supplying one. Since PUT (and also PATCH) request 'anticipate' a
> body,
> we could also care for these.
>
> Matthew, could you also check for 'put and 'patch' request and send an
> amended
> version of the patch. FYI, HTTP PATCH request is rfc5789.
Attached
0001-Always-send-Content-Length-with-POST-PUT-PATCH.patch
Description: Text Data
- [Bug-wget] Bug Track, Tushar, 2014/10/18
- Re: [Bug-wget] Bug Track, Tim Rühsen, 2014/10/19
- [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Matthew Atkinson, 2014/10/19
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Tim Rühsen, 2014/10/19
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Matthew Atkinson, 2014/10/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2014/10/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Matthew Atkinson, 2014/10/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Tim Rühsen, 2014/10/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body,
Matthew Atkinson <=
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Matthew Atkinson, 2014/10/23
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Tim Rühsen, 2014/10/22