[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body
From: |
Tim Rühsen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:21:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16-2-amd64; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2014, 09:39:25 schrieb Matthew Atkinson:
> On 20/10/14 21:16, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> > Since Wget does not explicitly support PUT, we may just care for the POST
> > request. Since servers may reject a POST without Content-Length, we are
> > better off with supplying one. Since PUT (and also PATCH) request
> > 'anticipate' a body, we could also care for these.
> >
> > Matthew, could you also check for 'put and 'patch' request and send an
> > amended version of the patch. FYI, HTTP PATCH request is rfc5789.
>
> Attached
Good work, thanks !
Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [Bug-wget] Bug Track, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-wget] Bug Track, Tim Rühsen, 2014/10/19
- [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Matthew Atkinson, 2014/10/19
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Tim Rühsen, 2014/10/19
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Matthew Atkinson, 2014/10/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2014/10/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Matthew Atkinson, 2014/10/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Tim Rühsen, 2014/10/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Matthew Atkinson, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body, Matthew Atkinson, 2014/10/23
- Re: [Bug-wget] Send Content-Length with POST 0 length body,
Tim Rühsen <=