Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] Force --show-progress to print progress bar to stderr

[Darshit Shah]

So, I tried pushing the changes, but I'm unable to do so. git push
gives me the following error:

Counting objects: 11, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (11/11), done.
Writing objects: 100% (11/11), 1.62 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done.
Total 11 (delta 10), reused 0 (delta 0)
error: unpack failed: unpack-objects abnormal exit
To git://git.savannah.gnu.org/wget.git
! [remote rejected] master -> master (n/a (unpacker error))
error: failed to push some refs to 'git://git.savannah.gnu.org/wget.git'


I even tried a fresh clone of Wget, but I keep getting the same error
which leads me to believe that the issue is in the savannah servers.
I've opened a support ticket, but if someone is able to push to the
repository, please push this commit.

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Darshit Shah <address@hidden> wrote:
> Aah! Thanks a bunch for pulling the details.
>
> I'll look into this (mostly) over the next weekend. Shouldn't be too hard.
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Tim Ruehsen <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 20 January 2015 14:45:50 Darshit Shah wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Tim Ruehsen <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> > On Sunday 18 January 2015 15:57:47 Darshit Shah wrote:
>>> >> This patch causes --show-progress to display the progress bar to the
>>> >> screen even when the --logfile option is provided to Wget.
>>> >>
>>> >> If the --show-progress option is not explicitly enabled, then the old
>>> >> behavior of printing the DOT progress to the log file is followed.
>>> >> Do review the patch, and if no one has objections I'll push this in a few
>>> >> days
>>> >
>>> > Hi Darshit,
>>> >
>>> > --show-progress in combination with -o looks very good !
>>>
>>> Thanks! I'll push it in a few hours once I'm back on my machine.
>>>
>>> > A while ago I made a suggestion for displaying long file names (remember
>>> > ?). Are you going to implement that, too ?
>>>
>>> I forget, what was it again? Been a little too busy with my work and
>>> hence have completely pushed these things aside.
>>
>> The thread was "Reverse Scrolling Direction", my answer dated 4.12. 09:41:20.
>>
>> It was (shortened)
>> - if the path is too long, just print the filename.
>> - if the filename is too long use ... in between
>>
>> Guiseppe's answer was
>> "that is a cool idea.
>>
>> Saving to: 'www.hostname.d.de/lkdfsldkflsdf/subdir/xxx/file-to-save'
>>
>> www.hostname.d.de/lkdfsldkfls[...]xx/file-to-save       [ <=>                
>>                                                       ]  77.81K  --.-KB/s   
>> in 0.1s
>>
>> I guess something like that, by default, would make happy everyone:-)"
>>
>> Tim
>
>
>
> --
> Thanking You,
> Darshit Shah



-- 
Thanking You,
Darshit Shah