bug-wget
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes


From: Hubert Tarasiuk
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 23:16:55 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

I see. I will give it a try and will get back to you.

Thank you for your assistance.

Hubert

W dniu 25.03.2015 o 22:49, Giuseppe Scrivano pisze:
> Please keep bug-wget in CC as it will include more people in the
> discussion.
> 
> My refactoring wasn't very logical, I have just moved code outside of
> gethttp. I would like that each of these functions would make more sense
> and maybe be testable. Makes sense?
> 
> Regards,
> Giuseppe
> 
> Il 25 marzo 2015 22:11:47 CET, Hubert Tarasiuk
> <address@hidden> ha scritto:
> 
>     Hi Giuseppe,
> 
>     Yes, I can compile wget from repository.
> 
>     I've looked at the function you mentioned. I could do some more cleanup
>     - mainly by factoring out parts of the code into separate functions - as
>     I saw in your commits. Would that be appropriate, or did you mean
>     something different?
> 
>     (Not sure if this part of conversation is relevant for entire bug-wget,
>     so excluded it from CC. Let me know if I should keep CCing that list.)
> 
>     Best regards,
>     Hubert
> 
> 
>     W dniu 25.03.2015 o 21:00, Giuseppe Scrivano pisze:
> 
>         Hubert Tarasiuk <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>             Hello to everyone,
> 
>             My name is Hubert Tarasiuk and I am a CS student at the
>             University of
>             Warsaw, Poland (expected graduation date July 2015, B.Sc.).
> 
>             I am working on my Google Summer of Code proposal for two of
>             the GNU
>             wget ideas':
> 
>                 Speed up Wget's Download Mechanism
>                 Improve Wget's Security
> 
> 
>             As the deadline is approaching, I would like to start
>             working on my
>             patches. After checking the list on GitHub I see, that just
>             one of the
>             bugs appears to be good for me: 41002. Others are either
>             closed/in
>             progress/in discussion, or already have a patch proposed.
> 
>             My question: is the bug I mentioned still good for me, or
>             perhaps is
>             someone working on it already?
>             If latter, can you provide an alternative? Or should I browse
>             Savannah/Coverity and pick something myself?
> 
> 
>         I think that bug was already fixed and there is not anything
>         left to do.
> 
>         Were you already able to build wget from the git repository?
> 
>         I've started working on some cleanup for the gethttp function in the
>         http.c file, but still there is much left to do, maybe it is
>         easier for
>         some fresh eyes to identify better how to make it more readable,
>         would
>         you be interested in that?
> 
>         Regards,
>         Giuseppe
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]