[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes
From: |
Hubert Tarasiuk |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2015 23:16:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 |
I see. I will give it a try and will get back to you.
Thank you for your assistance.
Hubert
W dniu 25.03.2015 o 22:49, Giuseppe Scrivano pisze:
> Please keep bug-wget in CC as it will include more people in the
> discussion.
>
> My refactoring wasn't very logical, I have just moved code outside of
> gethttp. I would like that each of these functions would make more sense
> and maybe be testable. Makes sense?
>
> Regards,
> Giuseppe
>
> Il 25 marzo 2015 22:11:47 CET, Hubert Tarasiuk
> <address@hidden> ha scritto:
>
> Hi Giuseppe,
>
> Yes, I can compile wget from repository.
>
> I've looked at the function you mentioned. I could do some more cleanup
> - mainly by factoring out parts of the code into separate functions - as
> I saw in your commits. Would that be appropriate, or did you mean
> something different?
>
> (Not sure if this part of conversation is relevant for entire bug-wget,
> so excluded it from CC. Let me know if I should keep CCing that list.)
>
> Best regards,
> Hubert
>
>
> W dniu 25.03.2015 o 21:00, Giuseppe Scrivano pisze:
>
> Hubert Tarasiuk <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Hello to everyone,
>
> My name is Hubert Tarasiuk and I am a CS student at the
> University of
> Warsaw, Poland (expected graduation date July 2015, B.Sc.).
>
> I am working on my Google Summer of Code proposal for two of
> the GNU
> wget ideas':
>
> Speed up Wget's Download Mechanism
> Improve Wget's Security
>
>
> As the deadline is approaching, I would like to start
> working on my
> patches. After checking the list on GitHub I see, that just
> one of the
> bugs appears to be good for me: 41002. Others are either
> closed/in
> progress/in discussion, or already have a patch proposed.
>
> My question: is the bug I mentioned still good for me, or
> perhaps is
> someone working on it already?
> If latter, can you provide an alternative? Or should I browse
> Savannah/Coverity and pick something myself?
>
>
> I think that bug was already fixed and there is not anything
> left to do.
>
> Were you already able to build wget from the git repository?
>
> I've started working on some cleanup for the gethttp function in the
> http.c file, but still there is much left to do, maybe it is
> easier for
> some fresh eyes to identify better how to make it more readable,
> would
> you be interested in that?
>
> Regards,
> Giuseppe
>
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes, Hubert Tarasiuk, 2015/03/25
- Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2015/03/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes,
Hubert Tarasiuk <=
- Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes, Hubert Tarasiuk, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes, Hubert Tarasiuk, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes, Hubert Tarasiuk, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes, Darshit Shah, 2015/03/28
- Re: [Bug-wget] [GSOC] Bugfixes, Hubert Tarasiuk, 2015/03/28