bug-wget
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 25/25] New: --metalink-over-http Content-Type/Disp


From: Matthew White
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 25/25] New: --metalink-over-http Content-Type/Disposition Metalink/XML processing
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 06:21:32 +0200

Hi Giuseppe,

On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 19:52:18 +0200
Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi Matthew,
> 
> Matthew White <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > [Coverity Scan is ok, make syntax-check is ok, make check-valgrind is ok, 
> > contrib/check-hard is ok]
> >
> > This implements the auto-processing of Metalink files part of a 
> > "Content-Type: application/metalink4+xml" header answer.
> >
> > e.g.:
> > $ wget --metalink-over-http \
> >        --metalink-index=inf \
> >        [--content-disposition \]
> >        [--trust-server-names \]
> >        [--header="Accept: */*,application/metalink4+xml" \]
> >        <url answering with a "Content-Type: application/metalink4+xml">
> >
> > The following description is verbatim from the patch:
> > -----
> > Process the Content-Type header, identify an application/metalink4+xml
> > file.  The Content-Disposition could provide an alternate name through
> > the "filename" field for the metalink xml file.  Respectively, the cli
> > options --metalink-over-http and --content-disposition are required.
> >
> > When Metalink/XML auto-processing, to use the Content-Disposition's
> > filename, the cli option --trust-server-names is also required.
> > -----
> 
> this looks fine to me as well.
> 
> Could you please re-send the updated series?

You may find the series of patches in my branch 
https://github.com/mehw/wget/tree/metalink_staging .

There's a new Metalink/XML v3 python class:
* testenv/misc/metalinkv3_xml.py

I still have to update the NEWS file.

> 
> I had some problems applying your patches, as some comments from the
> emails got into the patch itself, could you try with git send-email?

About `git send-email`, what Subject, In-Reply-to, and References should be 
used to post the series of patches?

What about the gpg signature?

> 
> Thanks,
> Giuseppe

Regards,
Matthew

-- 
Matthew White <address@hidden>

Attachment: pgpCllHypRkYa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]