bug-wget
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transfer


From: Tim Rühsen
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:06:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 09/14/2017 12:11 PM, Josef Moellers wrote:
> On 14.09.2017 10:12, Tim Rühsen wrote:
>> On 09/14/2017 09:53 AM, Josef Moellers wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have seen (at least) one server who has
>>> Accept-Ranges: bytes
>>> in his header but, upon receiving a request with
>>> Range: bytes=23068672-
>>> responds with
>>> HTTP/1.1 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable
>>> although the file was not transferred completely!
>>>
>>> wget then claims that
>>> The file is already fully retrieved; nothing to do.
>>>
>>> E.g.
>>> run
>>>   wget https://downloads.dell.com/FOLDER02721216M/1/SUU_14.12.200.69.ISO
>>> the, after a couple of MB, abort the transfer and then continue the
>>> download:
>>>   wget --continue
>>> https://downloads.dell.com/FOLDER02721216M/1/SUU_14.12.200.69.ISO
>>>
>>> Maybe the check in src/http.c:
>>> 3821   if (statcode == HTTP_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_SATISFIABLE
>>> 3822       || (!opt.timestamping && hs->restval > 0 && statcode ==
>>> HTTP_STATUS_OK
>>> 3823           && contrange == 0 && contlen >= 0 && hs->restval >= contlen))
>>>
>>> should be changed and any HTTP_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_SATISFIABLE with an
>>> incomplete file should show something like
>>>
>>> "download continue failed, file incomplete"
>>
>> Well, that would be ok for this special server.
>>
>> Normally 416 together with a server timestamp matching the file's
>> timestamp means that the file is complete (as far as the client can
>> judge from HTTP).
>>
>> IMO, if the server is broken (or misbehaves) then the server should be
>> repaired. Except it is a very common misbehavior. In which case we could
>> consider a work-around on the client side.
>>
> 
> So I humbly propose the attached patch.
> I tried to create a pull request, but got a 403.

Thanks for the patch - I'll test it in the next days.
BTW, we currently work on Wget2 where we have a related issue, if you
like to take a look at it: https://gitlab.com/gnuwget/wget2/issues/278

With Best Regards, Tim

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]