bug-wget
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Codespell report for "Wget" (on fossies.org)


From: Fossies Administrator
Subject: Re: Codespell report for "Wget" (on fossies.org)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:57:12 +0100 (CET)
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01)

Hi Tim,

The typos are fixed now, a script 'spell-checking' has been added and is
used in the CI now.

That seems to be a good idea.

I hope the "pressure" wasn't too high and I'm happy that I could help
a little bit on this not too important topic.

And thanks for your friendly and motivating words.

Jens  (a longtime and pleased wget user)

On 2/20/20 4:01 PM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
Hi Jens,

quite a nice service, thank you for all that work. It's awesome !

We are aware of codespell but so far only use it as a CI check for
Wget2[1]. We didn't bother to backport the script yet to Wget 1.x.
See [2] and [3].

Indeed we plan for a new release - so you put some pressure on us to
correct all those misspellings now :-)

We will not correct words in "ChangeLog", as this is automatically
generated from git commit messages. And we can't change git commit
messages as this would destroy history (blockchain, you know ;-)).

There is also m4/po.m4 that we won't change, as it is from gettext.

Regards, Tim

[1] https://gitlab.com/gnuwget/wget2
[2] https://gitlab.com/gnuwget/wget2/-/blob/master/contrib/spell-checker
[3] https://gitlab.com/gnuwget/wget2/-/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml#L74


On 2/20/20 11:19 AM, Fossies Administrator wrote:
Hi,

the FOSS server fossies.org - also supporting "Wget" - offers a new
feature "Source code misspelling reports":

 https://fossies.org/features.html#codespell

Such reports are normally only generated on request, but as Fossies
administrator I have just created an analysis for the current "Wget"
release 1.20.3 (since a new release seems coming soon):

 https://fossies.org/linux/www/wget/codespell.html

That version-independent (not linked) URL should redirect always to the
last report (if available), so currently to

 https://fossies.org/linux/www/wget-1.20.3.tar.lz/codespell.html

Although after a first review some obviously wrong matches ("false
positives") are already filtered out (ignored) please inform me if you
find more of them so that I can force a new improved check if applicable.

Just for information there are also two supplemental pages

 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/wget/codespell_conf.html

showing some used "codespell" configurations and

 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/wget/codespell_fps.html

Although except for the "usual" errors in the ChangeLog file only few
and unspectacular errors are found I hope that the report can be
nevertheless a little bit helpful.

Regards

Jens


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]