bug-wget
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug #57884] wget reveals my operating system to the server


From: Tim Rühsen
Subject: Re: [bug #57884] wget reveals my operating system to the server
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:05:31 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

On 2/24/20 11:58 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> Interesting - forcing a user agent string could be in violation of GDPR since 
> it would definitely make the user environments more identifiable. The 
> "fingerprinting" discussion refers. On the other hand, if all browsers 
> henceforth were to send the same string the opposite would be true. 
> 
> I wonder about the reason given: "To avoid compatibility issues." That was - 
> if I recall correctly - the reason for having the string to start with: So 
> that servers can format pages to suit the capabilities of the browser and 
> version used. If in the future all browsers were using the Chromium engine 
> this mechanism might no longer be needed and web pages would no longer need 
> to adjust for browser differences - although I can't see a world where all 
> browsers on all types of devices and all "other" client software would be 
> behaving identically. 

From the google link:
Alternative implementation suggestion for web developers

For many (most?) uses of UA sniffing today, a better tool for the job
would be to use feature detection. Where feature detection fails
developers, UA Client Hints are the right path forward.

https://wicg.github.io/ua-client-hints/

Regards, Tim

> 
> Gerd
>  
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Ruehsen" <address@hidden>
> To: "Tim Ruehsen" <address@hidden>, "Bruno Haible" <address@hidden>, 
> address@hidden, "bug-wget" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 12:10:56 PM
> Subject: [bug #57884] wget reveals my operating system to the server
> 
> Follow-up Comment #6, bug #57884 (project wget):
> 
> There seem to be concerns and actions taken by browser vendors about regarding
> the User-Agent header. It's about "freezing" the User-Agent string once and
> for all to avoid compatibility issues.
> 
> Is this an option for us ?
> 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/-2JIRNMWJ7s/yHe4tQNLCgAJ
> 
> https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/discussions/new-privacy-oriented-feature-added-to-edge-82-freeze-user-agent/m-p/1165269
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________________
> 
> Reply to this item at:
> 
>   <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57884>
> 
> _______________________________________________
>   Message sent via Savannah
>   https://savannah.gnu.org/
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]