[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: CERTI Java-binding ?; Was: [certi-dev] certi performance comparison
From: |
Gotthard,Petr |
Subject: |
RE: CERTI Java-binding ?; Was: [certi-dev] certi performance comparison |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jul 2008 14:42:35 +0200 |
Hi,
> Our idea for CERTI in Java would be to avoid JNI interface
> and to build a full Java implementation which is is
> compatible with CERTI C++ at the message level.
>
> In CERTI HLA API call (RTIA/FederateAmbassador callbacks) are
> translated to/from Messages sent/received on a socket
> handled by different RTI processes (RTIG and RTIA)
You're building a Java version of libRTI (RTIambassador) communicating
with the C++ RTIA, right? I think this is the best way to do HLA
bindings to different languages.
> I don't think CERTI is near to fullfill such needs now.
> May he should have a look to Portico RTI, which natively
> support Java binding (and C++ through JNI I think)
> http://porticoproject.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
>
> May be the FlightGear HLA plugin would work with Portico as well,
>
> Petr may answer this better than me.
The FlightGear plug-in doesn't depend on any CERTI specific functions,
so it may work. I have never tried. I was scared away by the dependency
on Java. I was even not able to compile the Portico's RTI.
Petr
- CERTI Java-binding ?; Was: [certi-dev] certi performance comparison, Martin Spott, 2008/07/01
- Re: CERTI Java-binding ?; Was: [certi-dev] certi performance comparison, Eric Noulard, 2008/07/02
- RE: CERTI Java-binding ?; Was: [certi-dev] certi performance comparison,
Gotthard,Petr <=
- [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;, Martin Spott, 2008/07/02
- RE: [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;, Gotthard,Petr, 2008/07/02
- Re: [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;, Eric Noulard, 2008/07/02
- Re: [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;, Martin Spott, 2008/07/02
[certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;, Martin Spott, 2008/07/02