Re: [Chicken-hackers] (load ...)

[Peter Keller]

On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:41:48PM -0400, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Peter Keller <address@hidden> wrote:

> Compilation is *always* explicit, via csc.

Ah! That explains my confusion. I didn't know this fact. I thought chicken
would analyze (load/use ...) files and compile them as well.

> Having said all that, whatever you are trying to accomplish is likely
> possible. Are you just feeling out your options, or do you have a specific
> problem in mind?

I'm just feeling out my options and learning the situations when something
is forced to compile and when something is intepreted. Your statement about
explicit compilation did a lot to clear things up for me.

Thank you.

-pete