chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-janitors] Re: [Chicken-bugs] #356: inline


From: Elf
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-janitors] Re: [Chicken-bugs] #356: inline recursion
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:18:49 -0800 (PST)

On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:

<snip>

HOWEVER! this is a comparatively minor optimisation compare to some of what
we should be paying attention to, so simply putting a compiler warning and
changing the one inline to non-inline would be more than sufficient in the
short term.  gc and number handling improvements would be orders of magnitude
more useful :)

What kind of improvements would you suggest?


working that out currently. i dont want to start making suggestions or 'complaints' without being able to back it up with code or pseudocode. :)

-elf





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]