chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] encoded-literals


From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] encoded-literals
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:14:41 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

felix winkelmann scripsit:

> I have merged the "encoded-literals" branch into the trunk, in which
> literals in code are decoded at runtime from a machine-independent
> binary format. 

Does this mean that the restriction against compiling code that contains
bignum literals has been lifted?

-- 
My confusion is rapidly waxing          John Cowan
For XML Schema's too taxing:            address@hidden
    I'd use DTDs                        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If they had local trees --
I think I best switch to RELAX NG.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]