chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] config-arch.sh: shouldn't use uname


From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] config-arch.sh: shouldn't use uname
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:11:12 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:59:19AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 9:29 AM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > I think this opens the door to cross-compilation, and that's definititely
> > an interesting thing to have.
> >
> 
> chicken can be cross-compiled for ages. Just pass ARCH.

Oops :)  Sorry for the confusion.

What's your take on the uname -s vs uname -p?

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth

Attachment: pgpBe0ozlUi8U.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]