[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] config-arch.sh: shouldn't use uname
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] config-arch.sh: shouldn't use uname |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:11:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:59:19AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 9:29 AM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > I think this opens the door to cross-compilation, and that's definititely
> > an interesting thing to have.
> >
>
> chicken can be cross-compiled for ages. Just pass ARCH.
Oops :) Sorry for the confusion.
What's your take on the uname -s vs uname -p?
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
pgpBe0ozlUi8U.pgp
Description: PGP signature