[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] time->string
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] time->string |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:43:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Zbigniew scripsit:
> On Jan 19, 2008 12:59 PM, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Instead, I suggest making time->string return an ISO 8601 time string of
> > the form "yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss+zzzz"
>
> Well, ISO 8601 time strings are already available in SRFI-19, and
> they're not particularly readable.
I realize that. The point is, if you want a function that reduces
a broken-out time object to a string, what string should you get?
The asctime(3) string strikes me as a particularly silly format.
Alternatively, you could just deprecate time->string.
> (string-append
> (time->string (seconds->local-time (current-seconds)))
> " " (local-timezone-abbreviation))
It's called "local" but it's not localized.
--
Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML John Cowan
Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker address@hidden
saying "No information items inside". http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--Eve Maler